Lianyi JIN

Business expertise:

Ms. Jin, graduated from China University of Political Science and Law , has engaged in trademark agency and trademark lawyer since 2015 with professional qualification of Chinese lawyers, serving customers including domestic and foreign enterprises. She has been engaged in trademark agency for a long time, familiar with the trial standards of Trademark Office and the Court, acting on a large number of trademark prosecution and litigation cases. Besides, she is also able to handle copyright, domain names, unfair competition and other cases.

Operational area:

Intellectual Property Administrative Litigation

Practice experience:

Ms. Jin, a professional intellectual property lawyer, has entered the intellectual property industry since 2015 and obtained a legal professional qualification certificate in the same year also the lawyer's license in 2019. She is good at  trademark layout, intellectual property consultation, trademark authorization and other litigation and non-litigation intellectual property issues. She has served well-known enterprises at home and abroad such as Dunhuang net dhgate.com、 Golden Monkey, Xinjiang Huanta Rally, Letv, Hao Liyou, Metro, Novartis Pharmaceutical, Sanofi Pharmaceutical, Italy Briño and so on.

Typical cases:

1. Trademark administrative dispute (first instance) of No.31942724 “SNK” between SNK Co., Ltd and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board；
2. Trademark administrative dispute (first and second instance) of No.22939916 “CPTG” between Duterre Holdings Limited and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board;
3. Trademark administrative dispute (second instance) of No.15095994 graphic trademark between Aikonis Entertainment Company and the Trademark Review and Trademark Review and Adjudication Board as well as the third party Shandong Jiuri Import and Export Co., Ltd.;
4. Trademark administrative dispute (first and second instance) of No.13447154 “RMSBEAUTY” between Rosemary Swift and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board as well as the third party Dalian Le Trade Technology Co., Ltd.;
5. Trademark administrative dispute (first instance) of No.14097310 “DigestZen” between Duterre Holdings Limited and the the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board;
6. Trademark administrative dispute (first and second instance) of No.19358036 graphic trademark between Quanzhou Sendike Sports goods Co., Ltd. and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board;
7. Trademark administrative dispute (first instance) of No.9714559 “WUXI METRO” between Wuxi Metro Group Co., Ltd. and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board as well as the third party MIP Metro Group intellectual property Co., Ltd. and Lianghe Company;
8. Trademark administrative dispute (second instance) of No.5883109 “METROTEL” between MIP Metro Group intellectual property Co., Ltd., Lianghe Company and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board as well as the third party Beijing China- Hong Kong Travel Weijing International Hotel Management Co., Ltd.;
9. Trademark administrative dispute (first instance) of No.15907549 “ELYSIUM HEALTH” between Alicia Health Co., Ltd. and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board ;
10. Trademark administrative dispute (first instance) of No.1222585 “HERO” between Mekfield Co., Ltd. and the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board;